Addressing Meme Culture in Law Enforcement Agencies
By Mark C. Borcina

The ubiquity of social media has given rise to a distinctive form of venting discontent in today’s professional environment—meme culture. This expressive outlet, where criticism intersects with humor, poses a challenge for senior law enforcement leaders regarding maintaining order and morale within their ranks.
Understanding this issue’s importance requires exploring the social contexts, examining the challenges teams face, stressing meme culture’s potential negative impact on community interactions, fostering a leadership environment where constructive criticism is welcomed, and highlighting the necessity of a team approach to counteract the negative effects of meme pages on organizational dynamics.
Social Contexts
Increasingly, law enforcement is grappling with challenges arising from social media-based meme pages—a humorous, often sophisticated online genre designed for expressing internal discontent with organizational authority. Understanding the social context behind the rise of meme culture is crucial for comprehending its impact within law enforcement agencies. The hierarchical structure inherent in these organizations often fosters a communication gap between frontline officers executing the daily mission and senior leaders attempting to deliver upon the agency’s strategic vision. This is likely more pronounced in large organizations where senior officials may not have daily or direct interactions with frontline officers.
In this context, meme pages become a form of subversive communication that enables dissenting voices to be heard outside traditional chains of command. Both a catalyst for positive change and a potential tool of team destruction, they are often weaponized by disgruntled individuals as a forum to express discontent or question authority. Memes are often pinpointed on degrading policy directives or highlighting senior leader decisional calculus by oversimplifying dynamic and often complex decisional junctures. If they go viral within a team (or—possibly worse—beyond institutional boundaries), meme creators can potentially wield tremendous power to promote change from within or tear down the institutions they serve.

Mark Borcina is a graduate of FBI National Academy Session 289.
Team Challenges
Social media pages act as a venting space for disgruntled employees, providing a medium to express grievances with a humorous twist. While some may find the comedic aspects entertaining, the consequences can be grave for both the team’s dynamic and the agency’s mission.
Negative meme creators implicitly advertise their lack of trust in an organization. Other law enforcement professionals following or condoning negative meme culture within an agency robs teams of an opportunity for productive conflict and erodes collective accountability. Ultimately, high-performing teams build on a base of trust to engage in open, constructive conflict, where team members—not just leaders—hold each other accountable for their actions in pursuit of results.1
Community Implications
Further, the implications extend far beyond the act of expression. Social media’s public nature ensures that these memes transcend internal audiences and reach the wider community. Memes that cut against the ethical application of an agency’s law enforcement policy or decisions made by senior leadership can tarnish the organization’s reputation, eroding public trust and confidence. In these cases, memes’ divisive nature can contribute to a toxic work environment, hindering collaboration and camaraderie among law enforcement professionals and the community they serve.
Leadership Measures
Senior law enforcement leaders need to consider a thoughtful, balanced response to this phenomenon. They must embrace proactive measures to effectively address discontent and meme culture from the top down. Open channels of communication are crucial. Encouraging officers to express concerns, provide feedback, and suggest improvements fosters a culture of transparency and allows leaders to address issues at their roots, curbing the need for subversive outlets.
The key mechanism that encourages open channels of communication within the organization is listening to constructive criticism. Acknowledging valid criticisms demonstrates a commitment to continuous improvement, fostering an environment where concerns are addressed constructively. Leadership encouraging officers to voice concerns through official channels—rather than social media—is a good place to start. Additionally, valuing diversity of thought, encouraging collaboration, celebrating successes, and recognizing hard work create an environment where officers feel valued and appreciated. These mechanisms not only mitigate the negative impact of memes but also help promote a harmonious work environment.
Whole-Team Approaches
Proactive monitoring of social media platforms is an essential strategy for early detection of potential problems. Establishing guidelines for responsible social media use and clearly communicating consequences for violating these guidelines can prevent an issue’s escalation. However, combating this organizational challenge will rely on a whole-team approach to foster understanding and buy-in to counteract the meme dynamic as eradicating meme pages is likely impractical.
“Understanding the social context behind the rise of meme culture is crucial for comprehending its impact within law enforcement agencies.”
Memes’ true power lies in their ability to virally infect a team’s attitudes. The danger of showcasing disillusionment on meme pages is their capacity to shape the sentiments of otherwise rational thinkers within an organization. Scholars propose that meme viewers often scroll social media when in a state of mental relaxation, making them more susceptible to accepting presented views (true or not), particularly if the meme’s subject resonates with them on a personal level.2 Moreover, individuals tend to accept statements accompanied by an image as truth (even when the statements are false), even if that image is unrelated to the topic.3
This presents an opportunity for discontent to be amplified among the collective organizational body, regardless of whether individuals generally discount the grievance as illegitimate when asked to consider all aspects of the topic at hand. Whether officers simply relate to a grievance, find humor in the satirical nature of the meme, or accept the viewpoint as truth on some level, they become susceptible to subconsciously engaging in confirmation bias as they consider the “negative” actions of decision makers.
An organization’s casual observers and/or followers of meme pages may contribute to widening the communication gap between frontline law enforcement employees and senior leaders. Memes’ informal nature, often driven by humor or criticism, may inadvertently contribute to misunderstandings or misinterpretations of organizational goals or policy requirements.
Formal and informal leaders alike should encourage their peers to avoid the trap of engaging in subversive forms of discontent and instead embrace open trust and constructive disagreement through official channels to elevate the team’s cohesion. By steering clear of activities that could amplify the divide between tactical and strategic vantage points, frontline law enforcement professionals may find increased appreciation for organizational goals.
This heightened understanding paves the way for improved efficiency as officers align their efforts more seamlessly with the organization’s broader objectives outside of their own limited scope. Encouraging a culture of accountability that refrains from meme involvement not only mitigates communication challenges but also contributes to a shared commitment to organizational success, ultimately enhancing overall efficiency, effectiveness, and team cohesion.
Conclusion
While many might consider meme culture to be harmless fun or an acceptable form of mild protest, understanding its subversive effect on team dynamics and community trust is a necessity in today’s social media-centric environment. Avoiding involvement or promotion through followership in meme culture is not simply a recommendation but should be a responsibility of every committed team member.
As a well-known author and organizational dynamics expert reminds us, “Success is a team sport.”4 Avoiding the snare of negative meme culture is an important step in fostering a more constructive and cohesive communication environment within an organization.
“Memes’ informal nature, often driven by humor or criticism, may inadvertently contribute to misunderstandings or misinterpretations of organizational goals or policy requirements.”
Endnotes
1 Patrick Lencioni, The Five Dysfunctions of a Team (New York: Jossey-Bass, 2002).
2 Ira Hyman, “The Menace of Memes,” Psychology Today, October 31, 2019, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mental-mishaps/201910/the-menace-memes.
3 Eryn J. Newman et al., “Nonprobative Photographs (or Words) Inflate Truthiness,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 19, no. 5 (August 2012): 969–974, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0292-0.
4 Simon Sinek (@Simonsinek), "Success is a team sport," X, May 26, 2023, 11:02 a.m., https://twitter.com/simonsinek/status/1662111889436942336.